2021年10月26日星期二

You are a depreciating asset

以上插圖來自 LinkedIn,被德國車廠高層轉發。對中年男人來說,車和女人都是昂貴的玩意,可以用來炫富,明白。 

以下故事來自已經結業的免費刊物 HK Magazine(日期:July 31, 2015),在網上世界廣泛流傳,有不止一個版本,金融從業員也許看過,內容是自稱 iBank CEO 的男人對拜金女擇偶條件的回應。 

Dear Ms X,

I have read your post with great interest. Guess there are lots of girls out there who have similar questions like yours. Please allow me to analyze your situation as a professional investor.

My annual income is more than $500K, which meets your requirement, so I hope everyone believes that I’m not wasting time here. From the standpoint of a business person, it is a bad decision to marry you. The answer is very simple, so let me explain.

Putting the details aside, what you’re trying to do is an exchange of “beauty” and “money”. Person A provides beauty, and Person B pays for it, fair and square.

However, there’s a deadly problem here: your beauty will fade, but my money will not disappear without any good reason. The fact is my income might increase from year to year, but you won’t be prettier year after year.

Hence from the viewpoint of economics I am an appreciating asset, and you are a depreciating asset, it is not just normal depreciation, but exponential depreciation. If that is your only asset, your value will be much worse 10 years later.

By the terms we use in Wall Street, every trading has a position, dating with you is also a “trading position”.

If the trade value dropped we will sell it and it is not a good idea to keep it for long term – same goes with the marriage that you wanted. In order to make a wise decision any assets with great depreciation value will “leased”.

Anyone with over $500K annual income is not a fool, we would only date you, but will not marry you. I would advise that you forget looking for any clues to marry a rich guy.

Hope this reply helps.

Signed,

iBank CEO

Auntie 的評論:這篇英語短文運用了一個會計學概念:貶值速度快的資產 (Asset) 只適合短期租用 (Lease) 而非長期持有 (Hold)。作者從男人的角度出發,貶低女人,行文偏頗,有爭議的餘地。

首先,女人的衰老速度比男人快,越是漂亮的女人保養費用越高,是真的。但是女人有化妝品可以稍為掩飾一下,男人除非從事娛樂(或色情)事業,否則不會日日化妝(偽娘咩?),所以老態容易顯露,又或者因為生病或各種打擊一下子變老,所以做男人未必有著數(相對於做女人而言)。那些男人越老越有味道但女人越老越不值錢的言論,是用來貶低女人的,小妹妹不要中計。得罪講句,環顧四周,老得優雅的男人並不多。做過電影編劇的男人這樣說:「中年男人再婚,最好不要超過 50 歲,否則鏡頭下的結婚照似父親嫁女多一點。」這才是真話!華人社會的客觀現實,是中佬再婚通常是父女戀甚至爺孫戀,在無情的鏡頭下,變成一樹梨花壓海棠。男士們,明白未?慘就慘在家陣偉大祖國禁「偽娘」,連男藝人都不可以靠化妝品吸客推高瀏覽量做代言人賺廣告費,問你死未?

其次,因為醫學進步,不少女人去到四、五十歲依然保養良好,她們的人生並非在 35 歲結束(原因:女人過了 35 歲生育能力會下降)。中文傳媒迫女人結婚生育,背後牽涉政治任務和商業利益,請參考這個博客內的另一篇文章<衍生需求>(日期:2011 9 19 日)。除非閣下是尋找生育機器的男人,否則選老婆沒有必要限定 35 歲以下。華人社會,思想傳統的男人多,他們視女人為洩慾工具和生育機器,也喜歡(透過公開渠道)發表貶低女人的言論,請參考這個博客內的另一篇文章<笨男人>(日期:2018 10 26 日)。如果閣下是好色老翁,只會選擇二十來歲甚至十來歲的小妹妹,Auntie 不適合你,請回。

第三,金融業打工仔的薪水並非只升不跌。這個行業本質上缺乏穩定,弱小心靈不宜。如果閣下是中層或高層的男性金融從業員,遇上金融地震海嘯風暴,然後被裁員加入失業大軍,之後未必可以重操故業。閣下(有學歷的中年男人)的出路是轉行、創業或移民。如果是外國人,很大機會離開香港,轉戰另一個亞洲城市(例如:上海或新加坡),又或者返祖家(例如:英國、美國),也有人轉入大學教書(全職或兼職)。這種故事,我聽得多。如果拜金女想尋找長期飯票,金融才俊未必是最佳選擇,要穩定不如選高級公務員或專業人士。但是今日香港連這條路也開始行不通了,原因是公務員隊伍開始換血,專業人士例如醫生、律師和會計師也相繼被整頓,日後未必有穩定收入。

結論:通殺!

拜金男女懂得計算也沒用,因為敵不過當權者的鐵拳。

延伸閱讀/參考資料:

Investopedia - Depreciation

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/depreciation.asp

Definition: The term depreciation refers to an accounting method used to allocate the cost of a tangible or physical asset over its useful life or life expectancy. Depreciation represents how much of an asset's value has been used. Depreciating assets helps companies earn revenue from an asset while expensing a portion of its cost each year the asset is in use. Not accounting for depreciation can greatly affect a company's profits. Companies can also depreciate long-term assets for both tax and accounting purposes.

Key points:

  • Depreciation ties the cost of using a tangible asset with the benefit gained over its useful life.
  • There are many types of depreciation, including straight-line and various forms of accelerated depreciation.
  • Accumulated depreciation refers to the sum of all depreciation recorded on an asset to a specific date.
  • The carrying value of an asset on the balance sheet is its historical cost minus all accumulated depreciation.
  • The carrying value of an asset after all depreciation has been taken is referred to as its salvage value.

相關的文章:

女人的路

2010 7 10

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2010/07/blog-post_10.html

節錄:傳統觀點,是女人只有兩條路可走:職業女性或者家庭主婦。這兩條路都很辛苦,只適合刻苦耐勞的好女人。於是有女孩子選擇第三條路,就是放下道德包袱,懶理別人的目光,做拜金女子,以釣金龜為終生事業。

OPM (Part 6)

2012 8 19

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2012/08/opm-part-6.html

節錄:拜金女子解決了物質生活之後,為了向玩弄她的老男人報復,又或者貪圖肉體歡娛,往往會一手破壞自己的安穩生活,結果是壞了名聲,再沒有男人上門,甚至是被戴綠帽的老男人殺死。這種事情,古代版,叫<宋江怒殺閻婆惜>。現代版,有香港的「鞋王三奶」李姿霆 (Karen)。拜金女子的慾望永無止境,她們既貪錢,也貪歡,結果是人財兩失,一無所有。

玩物與玩人(二)

2009 3 10

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2009/03/blog-post_10.html

節錄:被當作玩物的女人玩弄玩弄她的男人,結果兩敗俱傷。這種故事,古代版叫<宋江怒殺閻婆惜>,現代版叫<濟南貪官炸死二奶>。虛虛實實之間,事發地點都是山東。大概是梁山遺風,天下壞女人皆可殺。現代版和古代版的分別是:現代版的二奶懂得主動搜集老夫(貪官)的罪證,然後向有關部門檢舉。今日不少內地貪官,都是被情婦舉報的。

玩物與玩人(一)

2009 3 1

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2009/03/blog-post.html

節錄:大中華地區不少受過高等教育的女性,面對根深蒂固的重男輕女觀念,供過於求和人浮於事的就業市場,以及依然由男人掌握金錢和權力的中國式父權社會,都覺得揾工太難,打工的金錢回報太低,與其揾工不如揾老公,於是甘當男人的二奶三奶外室情人。結果是,讀過大學的女人成為貪官、暴發戶、明星藝人以及黑幫大哥的收藏品,而她們的學歷則成為男人的身份象徵。當唸過書的女人甘當玩物,然後回過頭來玩弄玩弄她們的男人,男女角力就變得份外變態。

錢銀女人

2015 1 15

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2015/01/blog-post_15.html

節錄:許仕仁這種男人,很像張愛玲筆下的佟振保 ―― 表面上事業有成,照顧家庭,符合主流社會的標準,內裡卻是個懦弱自私的小男人,有嫖妓的習慣,又發展婚外情,感情生活混亂。年紀不小了,但是從未長大。不負責任,累己累人。張愛玲小說<紅玫瑰與白玫瑰>的開頭:

母女情仇(六)

2015 7 23

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2015/07/blog-post_23.html

節錄:漂亮的女孩子,背後通常有個拜金母親。後者的養份來自:1. 傳統思想。覺得女兒是蝕本貨(養大益人),想在她身上賺點錢,減少虧蝕,能夠高價脫手更好。2. 慘痛經歷。母親年輕時被男人出賣過,不相信男人或愛情。她在心理上和經濟上又缺乏獨立自主的能力,是個沒有安全感的老女人,只能靠女兒吃飯或脫貧。這種母親,視女兒為搖錢樹,娛樂圈多的是。

光棍姻緣(一) 

2008 9 1

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2008/09/blog-post.html

節錄:有些做生意的男人,儘管公司已經週轉不靈,瀕臨破產邊緣,又或者自知紙包不住火,不法勾當即將曝光,依然大手花錢做宣傳,不斷招聘員工,同時向供應商大量入貨,以及繼續接受客戶的訂金和訂單。明明公司的業務已經走下坡,股價長期低殘,但是老闆依然帶著知名度甚高的女藝人出入娛樂場所,招搖過市,夜夜笙歌。聰明的銀行家,見狀都懂得第一時間上門追數,同時大幅削減甚至取消企業和老闆本人的信貸限額。因為他們都知道,這是一種桃色煙幕。

光棍姻緣(二) 

2008 9 10

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2008/09/blog-post_10.html

節錄:如果你是一心釣金龜的漂亮女藝人,對男人的要求(財富而言)比一般港女高出許多,符合你要求的男人自然少之又少,而難得合符條件的男人又已經放眼大中華,你面對的競爭實在非常激烈,就算「打崩頭」(廣東話:打架打到頭缺了一塊,形容戰況之慘烈)也未必搶到唐僧肉。面對白熱化的競爭,加上要趕死線(嫁有錢人必須在生理限期之前生孩子,否則地位不穩,亦難以分享老公的財富),以及減肥藥所帶來的副作用,女藝人情緒不穩,特別容易看錯人。

長腿叔叔(一) 

2012 1 14

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2012/01/blog-post.html

節錄:東方人社會,男尊女卑。結果是:男人容易高估自己,而女人則習慣隱藏實力。中國男人,永遠低估了女人的機心、演技和學習能力。中國女人的變化,也永遠在男人的掌握之外。為了迎合社會規範,很多中國女人都懂得扮演柔弱無助的小孤女,四出尋找長腿叔叔或者 Sugar Daddy

童養媳

20121 5

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2012/01/blog-post_05.html

節錄:從財務學的角度看,童養媳制度是父母替兒子分期付款(Installment)供老婆。家長用經營計算的態度處理下一代的婚姻,把媳婦當作畜牲或者資產,可以隨意處置,兒子的喜好則從來不在考慮之列。萬一兒子早死,又或者長大之後,到外面讀書,見過世面,接受了新思想,拒絕父母安排的包辦婚姻(很多民國文人和政治人物都是這樣),在外面有了意中人,甚至生下孩子,家長可以把童養媳當「養女」嫁出去,收回禮金。狠心一點,甚至可以把她賣落青樓。

「一帶一路」的副作用

2019 5 28

https://xiaoshousha.blogspot.com/2019/05/blog-post.html

節錄:跟隨「一帶一路」基建項目走出去的中國男人(例如:工程師以及國企的男性員工),為了解決生理需要以及尋找生育機器,用錢購買來自南亞或中亞的貧窮家庭或弱勢社群的土著女子,導致(有大陸人或當地人扮演中間人的)人口販賣活動出現,而土著女子跟隨丈夫到中國生活之後,有可能淪為性奴。

港雞 (HK Chicks)

2018 11 23

https://xiaoshousha.blogspot.com/2018/11/hk-chicks.html

節錄:殖民地時期,香港的定位,是商業社會、情報中心、移民城市、公眾碼頭及政治避難所。先天格局,是人來人往,過客匆匆,繁榮娼盛,弱勢女子容易淪為洩慾工具。歡場無真愛,嫖客無真心,不過是交易。花言巧語,聽完就算,無須認真。進進出出,迎送生涯,用完即棄。年老色衰,舉目無親,簡稱老舉(典出:胭脂扣)。用妓女比喻香港,是影視或文學作品的常見手法。

不是情人

2017 4 7

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2017/04/blog-post.html

節錄:喜歡亞洲美食的法國少女,沒有被大她十年以上的中國男人剝削,她並非男人的性奴。誰嫖了誰,還說不準呢。今日女權份子愛說的「情慾自主」,十五六歲的法國少女已經懂了。原著中,早熟的法國少女這樣反擊她的中國情人或嫖客: 「中國人到那裡移民,都不會被同化,他們在這裡和美洲都是一個樣,遷徙流離,四處落腳,誰也沒辦法用殖民方式安頓他們,這還不教人難受嗎?」

嫖客與馬伕

2015 6 17

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2015/06/blog-post_17.html

節錄:物以類聚,人以群分。嫖客心態的男人,只會吸引雞格的女人。但是他不明白問題出於自己的身上,只會理直氣壯地相信所有女人都是妓女,然後以歡場老手的語氣,教導其他男人如何憑女人的面相或胸型挑選床伴。「嫖妓指南」是中文傳媒的「優良」傳統,由幾十年前品評塘西風月的舊式文人,到今日的澳門鐵膽東莞肥龍夜遊手記,文字風格有變,但是本質不變。

情場 Drama King

2016 11 18

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2016/11/drama-king.html

節錄:本身是出來玩的男人,習慣用錢買女人,但是卻要求女人付出真心,又或者扮演賢妻良母。貪錢的女人交戲,他卻信以為真,結果被女人所操控。(提示:喜劇之王+柳飄飄+學生妹)

衍生需求

2011 9 19

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2011/09/blog-post_19.html

節錄:(主流傳媒)長年累月替女人洗腦,讓她們為結婚生子而活。與此同時,繼續抹黑和打壓那些特立獨行,拒絕按照時間表和方程式做人的大膽女子。這是主流傳媒的生存之道,因為挑動女人的神經,製造恐慌,方可自保。容易焦慮的女人,成為一個夕陽工業的救星,背後是龐大的商業利益,不難理解。

中年盤點(四)

2016 7 1

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2016/07/blog-post.html

節錄:至於那些催迫女人結婚生仔的言論,背後牽涉商業利益或政治任務,視女人為交數工具,想把魔爪伸入女人的身體。女人的身體,向來是戰場。如果你害怕或屈服,對方會以為自己法力高強,從此咬住你不放,甚至變本加厲。應該怎樣做女人,由你自己來決定。跟傳媒學做女人,你只會更加迷惘,成為自我形象低落以及缺乏安全感的笨女人,容易被操控。

老問題

2021 5 28

https://xiaoshousha.blogspot.com/2021/05/blog-post_28.html

節錄:當人口老化形成不可逆轉的長期趨勢,對內不利消費行業(提示:內循環=刺激私人消費),對外也不利跟打壓中國的美帝長期抗戰(香港親建制媒體的觀點)。原因很簡單:有足夠的年輕人,才有足夠的廉價勞工(讓企業可以靠不停換血控制成本)及納稅人(去供養官府以及為退休保障制度注入新資金)。年輕人肯結婚生育,消費行業才有足夠的需求。對,靠人多。

入行障礙(一)

2012 12 7

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2012/12/blog-post_7.html

節錄:分析行業前景的五力模式 (Porter’s five forces) 中,有幾種常見的入行障礙 (Entry barriers / Barriers to entry)。其中一種,叫資本要求 (Capital requirements),意思是:進軍某個行業,需要龐大的起動資金,並非普通人或者中小企能夠負擔,於是入行者稀,容易形成壟斷。香港人的婚姻,物質門檻高,是個好例子。網上的電車男慨嘆,香港的戀愛婚姻市場貧富懸殊,有錢的老男人一拖幾,窮小子則只能打飛機(高射砲)。

收支平衡點 (Breakeven Point)

2021 6 12

https://xiaoshousha.blogspot.com/2021/06/breakeven-point.html

節錄:港人很難「躺平」,原因是樓價或租金太高,打工仔賺得少隨時變「瞓街」(粵:淪為露宿者)。任志剛說過,高樓價其實是香港的一種間接稅 (Indirect Tax)。換言之,所謂的「低稅率」不過是假像。當樓價或租金成為生活費中的固定成本 (Fixed Cost),令打工仔的收支平衡點難以降低,代價是影響健康或犧牲婚姻或生活質素欠佳。

笨男人

2018 10 26

https://xiaoshousha.blogspot.com/2018/10/blog-post_26.html

節錄:只有笨男人,才會透過公開渠道,教導女人如何做人。在華人社會的吹水界(即:官場+大學+傳媒),這種笨男人很常見,他們透過動機複雜的中文傳媒,對女人說三道四、指指點點,鬧出笑話或公關災難,卻渾然不覺,甚至自得其樂,又或者死撐到底。這種笨男人其實是找死或自設陷阱。原因?1. 女人的世界你懂得幾多?2. 閣下用甚麼身份跟女人說話?

心理測驗

2018 2 9

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2018/02/blog-post_9.html

節錄:如果你是男生,看中了某位女生,雙方只是普通朋友關係,她會跟你一起吃飯或喝咖啡聊天,但是認識不深,又或者正處於曖昧階段,你想知道自己有沒有機會,可以讓她看這幅插圖,然後逐個 Case 問對方是否同意。如果你夠膽,直接問她喜歡那種男人(請她提供號碼)也可以。正常情況,女人看見這幅圖,應該會笑。

請你食檸檬

2017 7 28

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2017/07/blog-post_28.html

節錄:女人對付她討厭的男人,常用的招數離不開:1. 裝作看不見對方,當男人透明。2. 黑臉或無表情,避免眼神接觸。3. 不回答對方的問題或訊息。4. 同行的時候,把大型手袋或購物袋掛在自己的臂彎,阻止男人接近。5. 如果男人走近或開聲,女人會轉身背向男人,或立即起身離開。6. 講一些很難聽的話,直接踐踏男人的自尊。7. 向男人提出不合理的要求。

車仔麵精神

2011 1 14

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2011/01/blog-post_14.html

節錄:車仔麵精神在於不浪費,Mix & Match,貧富兼容,有些女孩子會應用於感情生活上。既然找不到集齊「潘驢鄧小閒」五種美德的男人,又不想從此退出情場,她們決定從不同的男人的身上收集不同的特質,用自行配搭、七拼八湊的方式,為自己度身訂做她想要的感情生活。

中年盤點(三)

2016 6 24

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2016/06/blog-post_24.html

節錄:利用男人(收兵),是女人反抗父權社會的方式(例子:武則天)。從這個角度看,大陸女人是強者。以下是大陸女生的心聲(來自網上留言):「男人長得慢,但是卻死得早;女人成熟得快,但是青春有限。要在男人有限的清醒時間之內,把他們從茫茫人海中拖拉出來,然後調教成當老公的材料,真是想起都悲從中來。」

26/10/2021

 

 

 

 

 

2021年10月4日星期一

Pandora Papers

ICIJ links for readers interested in offshore finance:

ICIJ - PANDORA PAPERS

The largest investigation in journalism history exposes a shadow financial system that benefits the world’s most rich and powerful.

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/

Summary: ICIJ obtained more than 11.9 million financial records, containing 2.94 terabytes of confidential information from 14 offshore service providers, enterprises that set up and manage shell companies and trusts in tax havens around the globe. ICIJ shared the files with 150 media partners, launching the broadest collaboration in journalism history. For nearly two years, ICIJ organized and led an investigation that grew to encompass more than 600 journalists in 117 countries and territories. The secret documents expose offshore dealings of the King of Jordan, the presidents of Ukraine, Kenya and Ecuador, the prime minister of the Czech Republic and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. The files also detail financial activities of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “unofficial minister of propaganda” and more than 130 billionaires from Russia, the United States, Turkey and other nations. Ambassadors, mayors and ministers, presidential advisers, generals and a central bank governor appear in the files.

Pandora Papers: An offshore data tsunami

The Pandora Papers’s 11.9 million records arrived from 14 different offshore services firms in a jumble of files and formats – even ink-on-paper – presenting a massive data-management challenge

By Emilia Díaz-StruckDelphine ReuterAgustin ArmendarizJelena CosicJesús EscuderoMiguel Fiandor GutiérrezMago TorresKarrie KehoeMargot WilliamsDenise Hassanzade Ajiri and Sean McGoey

October 3, 2021

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/about-pandora-papers-leak-dataset/

Offshore havens and hidden riches of world leaders and billionaires exposed in unprecedented leak.

The Pandora Papers reveal the inner workings of a shadow economy that benefits the wealthy and well-connected at the expense of everyone else.

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/global-investigation-tax-havens-offshore/

The power players

The trove of more than 11.9 million confidential files shows how presidents, prime ministers, royals, elected officials — and some of their family members and closest associates — stash assets in a covert financial system with the help of firms who establish companies in secrecy jurisdictions. Explore the biggest political names uncovered in the data.

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/power-players/?utm_source=ICIJ&utm_campaign=8ce10323e7-20211003_WeeklyEmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_992ecfdbb2-8ce10323e7-83386730

Hong Kong

Former Chief Executive

Tung Chee-hwa

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/power-players/?utm_source=ICIJ&utm_campaign=8ce10323e7-20211003_WeeklyEmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_992ecfdbb2-8ce10323e7-83386730

Extract: Tung’s billionaire brother, Chee-chen, was Orient Overseas’ chairman and CEO. In 2018, the Tungs sold their stake to COSCO, a Chinese state-owned shipping firm. In 2017, the Tung brothers bought Rockington Ltd., a company registered in the British Virgin Islands, to open a bank account holding for $1 million in “liquid funds,” according to leaked files. The application form noted Tung Chee-hwa’s political position. The company is one of nearly 30 offshore companies that the Tungs have registered in jurisdictions such as the BVI and Nevis, another Caribbean island. Some of those companies were created for the shipping business, according to an ICIJ review of leaked files and Orient Overseas company records. Both Tung Chee-hwa and Tung Chee-chen did not respond to ICIJ’s repeated requests for comment.

Hong Kong

Former Chief Executive

CY Leung

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/power-players/?utm_source=ICIJ&utm_campaign=8ce10323e7-20211003_WeeklyEmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_992ecfdbb2-8ce10323e7-83386730

Extract: Leaked records show that Leung used shell companies to own shares in EuroAsia Properties, a DTZ subsidiary operating in Japan. The records show that in late 2015, one of those shell companies transferred its stake in EuroAsia Properties, valued at $302,500, to DTZ. The transfer occurred while Leung was under investigation by the anti-corruption agency. It is not clear whether he was compensated for disposing of the shares. In April 2017, while still Hong Kong’s top leader, Leung was listed as the owner of two British Virgin Islands companies, Wintrack Worldwide and Ace Link Property Ltd., the company that had held the stake in EuroAsia Properties. According to BVI registry documents, both companies were still active in November 2020. Leung didn’t respond to ICIJ’s repeated requests for comment.

China

Delegate, Henan province

Qiya Feng

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/power-players/?utm_source=ICIJ&utm_campaign=8ce10323e7-20211003_WeeklyEmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_992ecfdbb2-8ce10323e7-83386730

Russia

President Vladimir Putin's inner circle

Gennady Timchenko

Oil magnate

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/power-players/?utm_source=ICIJ&utm_campaign=8ce10323e7-20211003_WeeklyEmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_992ecfdbb2-8ce10323e7-83386730

Russia

President Vladimir Putin's inner circle

Konstantin Ernst

CEO of Channel One Russia

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/power-players/?utm_source=ICIJ&utm_campaign=8ce10323e7-20211003_WeeklyEmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_992ecfdbb2-8ce10323e7-83386730

Putin image-maker’s role in billion-dollar cinema deal hidden offshore

Leaked documents reveal Konstantin Ernst’s secret stake in massive, state-funded privatization deal.

By Margot GibbsKathryn Kranhold and Jelena Cosic

October 3, 2021

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/vladimir-putin-konstantin-ernst-russia-tv-offshore/

Great Britain

Former Prime Minister

Tony Blair

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/power-players/?utm_source=ICIJ&utm_campaign=8ce10323e7-20211003_WeeklyEmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_992ecfdbb2-8ce10323e7-83386730

Governments vow investigations within hours of Pandora Papers revelations

As the first wave of stories on a massive leak detailing the financial secrets of the global elite and enablers of a shadow economy is published, reactions roll in around the world.

By Spencer Woodman and Brenda Medina

October 4, 2021

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/governments-vow-investigations-within-hours-of-pandora-papers-revelations/?utm_source=ICIJ&utm_campaign=5f0763053c-20211004_WeeklyEmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_992ecfdbb2-5f0763053c-83386730

Suspect foreign money flows into booming American tax havens on promise of eternal secrecy

Confidential documents lay bare the inner workings of U.S. trust industry that serves global leaders and the super rich.

By Will Fitzgibbon, Salwan Georges and Debbie Cenziper

October 4, 2021

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/us-trusts-offshore-south-dakota-tax-havens/?utm_source=ICIJ&utm_campaign=5f0763053c-20211004_WeeklyEmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_992ecfdbb2-5f0763053c-83386730

How America’s biggest law firm drives global wealth into tax havens

Baker McKenzie has been a pioneer in corporate tax dodging. It now acts for notorious tycoons, arms makers and authoritarian regimes operating in the shadow economy.

By Sydney P. Freedberg, Agustin Armendariz and Jesús Escudero

October 4, 2021

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/baker-mckenzie-global-law-firm-offshore-tax-dodging/?utm_source=ICIJ&utm_campaign=5f0763053c-20211004_WeeklyEmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_992ecfdbb2-5f0763053c-83386730

Extract: Although internal Baker McKenzie records are not among the leaked files, the firm is mentioned in more than 7,500 documents, far more than any other big U.S. law firm. Many of the documents mentioning Baker McKenzie come from three offshore providers to which the firm or its clients delegated work: Trident Trust, with offices in the British Virgin Islands; Alemán, Cordero, Galindo & Lee (Alcogal), a law firm based in Panama and Asiaciti Trust, based in Singapore.

HONG KONG: Confecting a city of secrets. Hong Kong is a city of traders and shippers that has repeatedly transformed itself, expanding from shipping to manufacturing after World War II and then reinventing itself again. With the U.K.’s Caribbean dependencies already flourishing as tax havens in the 1970s, Hong Kong, on the other side of the offshore map, blossomed into Asia’s premier tax and secrecy haven. Also under the U.K.’s guiding hand, the island was shifting from trading to banking, from colonnades to shining towers, a playground for Wall Street and the wealthy that never allowed sentiment to stand in the way of profit. Enter Baker McKenzie. Its move onto the island in 1974 coincided with Hong Kong’s metamorphosis and paved the way for the firm to benefit later from China’s emergence as a global power. Through innovation, local alliances and lobbying, Baker McKenzie helped transform Hong Kong into a global financial hub, famous for low taxes, high secrecy and minimal rules. Milton Cheng, Baker McKenzie’s global chairman, based in Hong Kong, declined an interview. The firm declined to comment about client matters, citing “confidentiality obligations and legal privilege.”

Frequently asked questions about the Pandora Papers and ICIJ

https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/frequently-asked-questions-about-the-pandora-papers-and-icij/?utm_source=ICIJ&utm_campaign=f59b016ba7-20211020_WeeklyEmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_992ecfdbb2-f59b016ba7-83386730&ct=t

Extract: Is ICIJ an arm of the American government? Do funders like George Soros influence ICIJ’s reporting? ICIJ is not funded by, or affiliated with, the U.S. government. Our work is funded strictly through grants and generous donations. Donors support ICIJ’s general operations, technology and tools and investigative projects. ICIJ maintains a strict firewall between our editorial judgement and fundraising. The Open Society Foundations, founded by financier George Soros, donates generously to ICIJ but his contribution is a fraction of our overall budget. All editorial decisions are made independently, and no donor or institution influences ICIJ’s coverage.

Further readings: 

Let the light in: why the Guardian is publishing the Pandora papers

Leaks raise questions about the balance between confidentiality, privacy and the public interest

Paul Lewis

The Guardian (3 Oct 2021

https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/amp.theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/03/let-the-light-in-why-the-guardian-is-publishing-the-pandora-papers

Extract: What exactly is in the Pandora papers? Why did the Guardian decide to explore the leaked data? And how did we decide what to publish?

In terms of volume, this is the largest trove of leaked offshore data in history. It comes from offshore service providers operating in Anguilla, Belize, Singapore, Switzerland, Panama, Barbados, Cyprus, Dubai, the Bahamas, the British Virgin Islands, Seychelles and Vietnam.

The files were leaked to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), which is not identifying its source. The ICIJ gave 600 journalists around the world remote access to the leaked data to facilitate the largest journalistic collaboration in history. They include reporters from the Guardian, BBC, Le Monde and Washington Post.

Mining a leak of this size is a huge and complex task. It includes banking records, incorporation documents, correspondence and records showing the true ownership of shell companies. The 6.4m documents and 1.2m emails in the trove are written in English, Spanish, Mandarin, Korean, Russian and Greek.

The Pandora papers follow in the footsteps of two previous seismic leaks facilitated by the ICIJ. The Panama and Paradise papers, in 2016 and 2017, prompted global debates about the ethics of offshore finance and helped bring about some genuine reforms in places such as the British Virgin Islands.

Massive Leak Exposes the Hidden Fortunes of World’s Elite and Crooks

Credit: James O’Brien/OCCRP

October 3, 2021

https://www.occrp.org/en/the-pandora-papers/massive-leak-exposes-the-hidden-fortunes-of-worlds-elite-and-crooks

Extract: The files illustrate the truly global nature of the offshore business. It’s a hidden world in which a reported secret mistress of Russian President Vladimir Putin can get a luxury apartment in Monaco via an offshore shell company, and where the King of Jordan is able to secretly snap up real estate in London and Malibu. Again and again, the files show the ease with which money can be quietly moved around the world — including by politicians and others in positions of public trust.

From missing taxes to stolen artworks and smuggled antiquities, the Pandora Papers lays bare exactly how the offshore industry hides the fortunes of the world’s rich and infamous alike. In many cases, it has also facilitated the transfer of vast wealth from poor and developing countries to tax havens and wealthy enclaves in cities like London, where fashionable central areas have been gobbled up by politicians, officials, and their relatives. Trillions of dollars, mostly from the earnings of large corporations are believed to be stashed in offshore tax havens. Each year, tax avoidance alone is estimated to cost the world’s poorest countries $200 billion a year — far in excess of what they receive in development assistance. The vast, secret flow of offshore cash isn’t just hurting the budget bottom line. Across the world, it’s also feeding discontent and undermining governments’ legitimacy.

ICIJ 曝多國政要隱匿資產!

香港前特首董建華家族涉 72 境外公司

(台灣)自由財經 2021/10/04 

https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/3692261

節錄:國際調查記者聯盟(ICIJ3 日公布調查報告,指多位政府領導人與國家元首,在境外的避稅天堂隱匿為數可觀資產,這份名為「潘朵拉文件」(Pandora Papers)的調查報告披露的人員包含 336 位高層政要和官員,其中中國全國政協副主席董建華家族涉及 72 間境外公司。《法廣》報導則指出,身為香港前特首、中國全國政協副主席的董建華及其家族成員,也涉及至少 72 間境外公司,其中董建華本人擁有當中 7 間境外公司,董建華胞弟董建成也涉及透過 4 間境外公司持有銀行帳戶,並以另外兩間持有山頂及淺水灣的兩處豪宅。董建華的幼子董立新也有透過一間境外公司開設銀行帳戶。同樣有參與調查的港媒《立場新聞》報導則指出,董建華及其家族成員,包括其妻子董趙洪娉、長子董立均、幼子董立新、胞弟董建成、胞妹彭董小萍、侄女周董立茂及金昌玲等,於 1999 年至 2019 年分別為至少 72 間離岸公司的股東或董事。洩密文件顯示,董建華以個人或公司名義持有當中 7 間離岸公司的全部或部分股權。

潘朵拉文件揭隱匿資產

梁振英任特首時秘密賣股獲 754 萬台幣20 萬英鎊

(台灣)自由財經 2021/10/04

https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/3692322

節錄:國際調查記者聯盟(ICIJ3 日公布 600 多名國際記者合作的調查報告,揭露多位正要在境外隱匿可觀資產,參與調查的港媒消息指出,香港前特首梁振英也曾透過境外公司,迂迴持有境外公司股權,在其擔任特首期間,更曾出售一份股權並獲益 20 萬英鎊(約 754 萬台幣)。根據同樣有參與調查的港媒《立場新聞》報導指出,中國全國政協副主席梁振英昔日在擔任香港特首期間,曾以以信託形式持有戴德梁行外國分公司的 3 成股權,在 2015 12 月、梁振英還在擔任特首期間,該批股份被以 20 萬英鎊(約 754 萬台幣)出售。不過翻查行政會議利益申報,梁從未申報持有該公司股權、也沒有申報在任特首期間出售股權,因此外界無從得知他賣股獲益。

報導指出,當時負責賣出股份的是「Ace Link Property Limited」,是梁振英間接持有的境外公司,代表簽署的則是「LAM KWOK WING」。根據調查,林國榮會計師行的負責人林國榮,是梁振英的中學同窗,在該公司的公開文件中的英文姓名及簽名,與股權轉讓書的英文姓名相同,簽名也相似。報導提到,除了「Ace Link Property Limited」,梁振英也與「Wintrack Worldwide Ltd」及「 EuroAsia Properties Limited」這兩間境外公司有關,其中「Wintrack Worldwide Ltd」梁持有 99.9%股權,另外兩間則是全資持有。《立場新聞》為此分別詢問梁振英及林國榮,包含梁振英事前是否知悉出售股權一事、梁是否指示林賣股權等問題,不過到報導截稿前並未接獲回覆。國際調查記者聯盟於 9 月間詢問也曾詢問梁,一樣未獲回覆。

相關的文章: 

Kleptocracy(盜賊統治)

2021820

https://xiaoshousha.blogspot.com/2021/08/kleptocracy.html

節錄:盜賊統治 (Kleptocracy) 跟洗黑錢活動關係密切,有如連體嬰,或錢幣的兩面。Kleptocrats 是指貪污腐敗的當權者(竊國者),這個詞經常在英語傳媒對於洗黑錢活動的調查報導中出現。金錢無國界,竊國者透過離岸公司及複雜的股權結構,把不義之財轉移至對資產提供較佳保障的西方國家,然後隱藏起來。竊國者要保護自己的權力以及家族利益,必定會全力摧毀本國的法治及設法打壓公民社會,同一時間卻享受著西方國家所提供的法律保障,卑鄙無恥,對不對?

隱身術

2019 9 27

https://xiaoshousha.blogspot.com/2019/09/blog-post_27.html

節錄:早於 2018 年初中美貿易戰爆發之前,紅色資本的海外併購活動已經遇到困難。西方國家基於國家安全考慮,對中資說不(提示:倫敦交易所),又或者設置障礙。中資的回應方式,是動用港人、台商、南洋華僑甚至親共洋人 (Panda Hugger) 當人頭或 Frontman,讓大股東可以退居幕後。

諜影

2016  4  22 

http://xiaoshousha.blogspot.hk/2016/04/blog-post_22.html

節錄:根據 Washington Post 的報導,負責分析文件的國際調查記者聯盟 (The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, ICIJ) 背後的美國公共誠信中心 (Center for Public Integrity),金主是國際大鱷索羅斯 (George Soros)。他較早前表示會「沽空亞洲貨幣」,令偉大祖國非常緊張,官媒輪流開炮。索羅斯戰績彪炳,利用在金融市場賺來的錢,資助共產黨的對頭人。中國和俄羅斯的領導人首當其衝,被爆陰毒,理所當然。

Revised 24/10/2021